RTUEE / EC / EEEYr 2020 · Sem 82020

Q1MEMS and Nanotechnology

Question

16 marks

Q.1. (a) What is single electron tunneling? Explain current voltage characteristics of such devices. [8]

(b) How Top down and Bottom up approach are different? Explain their difference with one example. [6]

(c) Draw density of quantum states for nano rod & nano dot. [2]

Answer

Single Electron Tunneling and Current-Voltage Characteristics

Single electron tunneling (SET) is a nanoscale electronic transport phenomenon in which electrical current flows through a device one electron at a time, rather than as the continuous, effectively unquantized current flow observed in conventional macroscopic electronic devices. This phenomenon becomes observable and dominant when a conducting nanoscale island (called a quantum dot or Coulomb island) is connected to source and drain electrodes through two tunnel junctions with sufficiently high resistance and sufficiently small capacitance, such that adding or removing even a single electron from the island changes its electrostatic potential energy by an amount, called the charging energy, that is significant compared to the thermal energy kT available at the operating temperature.

The charging energy Ec = e^2/(2*C_total), where e is the elementary charge and C_total is the total capacitance of the island to its surrounding electrodes and gate, must exceed the thermal energy kT for single-electron effects to be observable rather than thermally smeared out - since C_total scales down as the island's physical size shrinks, achieving observable single-electron tunneling at practical (even room) temperatures requires nanoscale island dimensions, which is precisely why SET is fundamentally a nanotechnology-enabled phenomenon, historically only observable at cryogenic temperatures in larger islands but increasingly achievable at higher temperatures as nanofabrication techniques allow smaller and smaller islands to be reliably constructed.

Coulomb Blockade and Current-Voltage Characteristics

Coulomb Blockade I-V CharacteristicVIVth (threshold)

The characteristic current-voltage (I-V) behavior of a single-electron tunneling device exhibits a distinctive feature called the Coulomb blockade: at low applied bias voltage (within a threshold window around zero bias, of width roughly e/C_total), no current flows at all through the device, because the electrostatic energy cost of adding one extra electron to the island exceeds the energy supplied by the applied bias voltage, effectively blockading electron tunneling onto or off of the island. Only once the applied bias voltage exceeds this threshold does tunneling become energetically favorable, at which point current begins to flow, often exhibiting a characteristic 'Coulomb staircase' pattern in devices with asymmetric tunnel junction capacitances, where the current increases in a series of discrete steps as the bias voltage is increased, each step corresponding to the onset of an additional discrete electron-transfer channel becoming energetically accessible - this staircase I-V signature is one of the clearest experimental confirmations of genuinely quantized, single-electron-at-a-time charge transport, fundamentally distinct from the smooth, continuous I-V characteristic of conventional bulk semiconductor devices.

Single electron tunneling devices, exploiting this Coulomb blockade behavior, form the basis of proposed single-electron transistors (SETs), which use a gate electrode to electrostatically tune the island's potential and thereby control the conducting/blockaded state of the device, offering the prospect of extremely low-power switching (since each switching event involves the controlled transfer of only a single electron) for future ultra-low-power nanoelectronic logic and memory applications, though practical large-scale integration of SET devices remains challenged by device-to-device variability and the need for very low operating temperatures in many current implementations.

Top-Down vs Bottom-Up Approach

The top-down approach to nanofabrication starts with a larger, bulk piece of material and progressively removes or shapes material (through techniques such as photolithography, electron-beam lithography, and etching) to sculpt out the desired nanoscale structure - this is essentially a miniaturization strategy, extending the same subtractive manufacturing philosophy used in conventional semiconductor microfabrication down to ever-smaller feature sizes, and is the dominant approach used in the semiconductor industry for fabricating integrated circuits and MEMS devices. The bottom-up approach, by contrast, builds nanostructures by assembling them directly from smaller constituent units - individual atoms, molecules, or nanoscale building blocks - that spontaneously self-organize or are deliberately assembled into the desired final nanostructure, exploiting chemical bonding and self-assembly principles rather than physically carving material away from a larger bulk piece.

A representative example illustrating the difference is the fabrication of silicon nanowires: a top-down approach would start with a bulk silicon wafer and use advanced lithography combined with anisotropic etching to progressively narrow a silicon structure down to nanowire dimensions, whereas a bottom-up approach would instead grow the nanowire directly, atom by atom, using a vapor-liquid-solid (VLS) growth technique in which a catalyst nanoparticle (commonly gold) seeds the controlled, self-assembled growth of the silicon nanowire from silicon-containing precursor gas, atom by atom, without ever needing to remove material from a larger starting structure.

Density of Quantum States for Nano Rod and Nano Dot

Density of States: Nano Rod (1D) vs Nano Dot (0D)Energy EDOS1D (wire/rod): 1/sqrt(E-En)0D (dot): delta functions

For a nano rod (a one-dimensional, quantum-wire-like structure, confined in two dimensions but free in the third), the density of states exhibits characteristic 1/sqrt(E - En) singularities (van Hove singularities) at the bottom of each quantized subband En, producing a series of sharp spikes that decay as energy increases within each subband before the next subband's spike appears - this 1D density-of-states shape is fundamentally different from the smooth, monotonically increasing sqrt(E) density of states characteristic of bulk (3D) semiconductors. For a nano dot (a zero-dimensional structure, confined in all three spatial dimensions), the density of states collapses to a series of discrete delta functions, since a quantum dot's energy spectrum consists of genuinely discrete, atom-like energy levels with no continuous band structure remaining at all, making the quantum dot's density-of-states diagram simply a set of sharp spikes at each allowed discrete energy level, with zero density of states everywhere else - this progression from continuous (3D bulk) to van-Hove-singular (1D wire) to fully discrete (0D dot) density of states directly illustrates how progressively confining a material in more spatial dimensions progressively 'quantizes' its electronic structure toward increasingly atom-like, discrete behavior.

Beyond the Coulomb-staircase current-voltage signature described above, single-electron tunneling devices are also characterized by their charging energy relative to the thermal energy available at the intended operating temperature, which is why practical single-electron transistor demonstrations have historically required cryogenic cooling to observe clean, well-defined Coulomb blockade behavior, and why achieving room-temperature single-electron operation (requiring island capacitances on the order of atto-farads, correspondingly requiring island dimensions of only a few nanometers) remains an active area of nanofabrication research.

It is also worth noting a further example of the top-down versus bottom-up distinction: fabricating a MEMS cantilever beam via bulk or surface micromachining (etching or depositing and releasing a beam structure from a larger wafer) is a clear top-down process, whereas growing a semiconductor nanowire via the vapor-liquid-solid mechanism, discussed at length elsewhere in this examination, or synthesizing metal nanoparticles via wet chemical reduction of a metal salt precursor in solution, are clear bottom-up processes, illustrating that the top-down/bottom-up distinction applies broadly across both MEMS and nanotechnology fabrication, not merely to nanoelectronic device fabrication alone.

Back to Paper