RTUEE / EC / EEEYr 2019 · Sem 72019

Q2Wireless Communication

Question

16 marks

2. (a) Discuss Free space loss shortly. Derive expression for free space loss in dB. [8]

(b) Explain Fresnel zone clearance. Find out radius of first Fresnel Zone clearance. [8]

Answer

Free Space Loss and Fresnel Zone Clearance

Free space loss (also called free-space path loss) is the attenuation a radio signal experiences as it propagates through an idealized, unobstructed vacuum or free space between an isotropic transmit antenna and an isotropic receive antenna, arising purely from the geometric spreading (spherical divergence) of the radiated electromagnetic energy as it travels outward from the source, with absolutely no absorption, reflection, or scattering losses assumed. Free space loss increases with both the square of the distance and the square of the operating frequency, meaning higher-frequency systems and longer links inherently suffer greater path loss for the same antenna configuration, a fundamental physical constraint (rather than an equipment limitation) that governs all radio link budget calculations.

The free-space loss derivation begins with the power flux density radiated by an isotropic antenna of transmit power Pt at distance d, which spreads uniformly over the surface of a sphere of area 4pid^2, giving a flux density of Pt/(4pid^2). A receive antenna of effective aperture area Ae = (Grlambda^2)/(4pi) captures a fraction of this flux density equal to its aperture area, giving received power Pr = PtGtAe/(4pid^2) = PtGtGr(lambda/(4pid))^2, from which the free-space loss (defined as the ratio PtGtGr/Pr for isotropic antennas, Gt=Gr=1) is identified as Lp = (4pi*d/lambda)^2.

Expressed in decibels with distance in kilometers and frequency in MHz, this reduces to the widely used practical formula Lp(dB) = 32.44 + 20log10(d_km) + 20log10(f_MHz), directly showing the characteristic 20 dB-per-decade increase in loss with both increasing distance and increasing frequency, and forming the baseline (best-case, unobstructed) loss term against which all additional real-world propagation impairments (diffraction, multipath fading, rain attenuation, and atmospheric absorption) are added in a complete link budget.

Fresnel Zone Clearance and First Fresnel Zone Radius

Fresnel zone clearance refers to the requirement that a sufficient fraction of the first (and ideally all significant) Fresnel zone around the direct line-of-sight radio path must remain unobstructed by terrain, buildings, or vegetation, in order for the received signal to closely match the ideal free-space path loss prediction. The Fresnel zones are a family of concentric ellipsoidal volumes surrounding the direct path between transmitter and receiver, defined such that any wave reflected or diffracted from a point on the boundary of the n-th zone travels a path exactly n(lambda/2) longer than the direct path, corresponding to a phase shift of n180 degrees relative to the direct signal.

The radius of the first Fresnel zone at any point along the path, at distances d1 and d2 from the two path endpoints (with d1 + d2 = total path length d), is given by r1 = sqrt(lambdad1d2/(d1+d2)). Since a wave diffracting from the edge of the first Fresnel zone arrives 180 degrees out of phase with the direct wave, if the first Fresnel zone is significantly obstructed, the diffracted component destructively interferes with the direct signal, potentially causing severe signal cancellation; standard microwave and line-of-sight link engineering practice therefore requires maintaining a minimum clearance of at least 0.6 times the first Fresnel zone radius above any obstruction along the entire path profile (after also accounting for earth-curvature bulge using the effective earth radius model), ensuring the received signal level remains close to the theoretical free-space value predicted by the basic path-loss formula above.

It is worth emphasizing that the free-space loss formula derived above represents the theoretical minimum (best-case) path loss achievable for a given distance and frequency, since it assumes an idealized vacuum propagation medium with no atmospheric absorption, no reflections, and no obstructions of any kind. Any real terrestrial or satellite radio path will experience additional loss mechanisms on top of this free-space baseline - atmospheric gas absorption (oxygen and water vapor, particularly significant above about 10 GHz), rain attenuation (a major concern for Ku-band and Ka-band satellite links), and diffraction loss around any obstructions intruding into the Fresnel zone, as discussed above - meaning a complete link budget calculation must always add these supplementary loss terms to the free-space baseline computed from the formula derived here, in order to arrive at a realistic prediction of actual received signal strength for a given real-world path.

The practical importance of Fresnel-zone clearance calculations becomes particularly evident in terrestrial microwave link path surveys, where engineers must physically survey (or use detailed terrain elevation databases for) the entire proposed path route, computing the first Fresnel zone radius at every point along the path and comparing it against the actual terrain height (including the earth-curvature bulge computed via the effective earth radius model discussed elsewhere in this examination) to identify any potential obstruction points, and where necessary, either increasing antenna tower heights at one or both ends of the link, or introducing an intermediate repeater station, specifically to restore adequate Fresnel-zone clearance and avoid the substantial diffraction loss penalty that an inadequately cleared path would otherwise incur.

Together, the free-space path-loss formula and the Fresnel-zone-clearance criterion described above form the two most fundamental propagation-analysis tools used at the very earliest stage of any line-of-sight radio link design, establishing both the baseline expected signal attenuation and the minimum physical clearance requirement that the proposed antenna heights and path route must satisfy before any more detailed link-budget refinement (accounting for fading margins, atmospheric effects, and equipment-specific parameters) is undertaken.

This derivation and discussion together address both the free-space-loss and Fresnel-zone-clearance parts of the question.

Beyond the first Fresnel zone, higher-order Fresnel zones (n=2, 3, and beyond) are of less practical concern for basic link clearance purposes, since their alternating constructive and destructive contributions to the received signal (odd-numbered zones contributing constructively, even-numbered zones destructively, relative to the direct path) largely cancel when integrated over an unobstructed aperture, meaning the first Fresnel zone's clearance is overwhelmingly the dominant practical criterion actually applied in real link engineering practice.

Both the free-space-loss formula and the first-Fresnel-zone-radius formula derived here remain the two most fundamental equations that every line-of-sight radio link design begins from, regardless of the specific frequency band or application involved.

This closes out the complete treatment of both the free-space-loss and Fresnel-zone parts of the question.

Both formulas remain in constant everyday use by practicing radio link engineers worldwide.

Back to Paper