Q7Electromagnetics Waves
Question
Q.7 Derive an expression for the fields in a rectangular waveguide in the case of a Transverse Magnetic (TM) wave.
Answer
For TM modes in rectangular waveguide, Ez satisfies the Helmholtz equation with Ez=0 on all four walls (Dirichlet condition); solving by separation of variables gives Ez = E0 sin(mπx/a)sin(nπy/b)e^{−jβz}, from which all transverse field components (Ex, Ey, Hx, Hy) are derived via the standard TM field relations.
Governing equation: for TM modes (Hz = 0, Ez ≠ 0), the longitudinal electric field component Ez must satisfy the scalar Helmholtz equation in the waveguide's transverse cross-section:
Boundary conditions: since the tangential E-field must vanish on a perfectly conducting wall, and Ez is itself tangential to all four waveguide walls (x=0, x=a, y=0, y=b), the boundary condition for TM modes is Ez = 0 on all four walls — a homogeneous Dirichlet condition (unlike TE modes, where the corresponding condition on Hz is a Neumann condition, ∂Hz/∂n = 0).
Separation of variables: assume Ez(x,y,z) = X(x)Y(y)e^{−jβz}. Substituting into the Helmholtz equation and dividing through by XY separates the equation into two independent ordinary differential equations, X″/X = −kx² and Y″/Y = −ky², with kx²+ky² = kc². The general solutions are X(x) = A sin(kxx) + B cos(kxx) and Y(y) = C sin(kyy) + D cos(kyy). Applying Ez=0 at x=0 forces B=0; applying Ez=0 at y=0 forces D=0; applying Ez=0 at x=a forces kx = mπ/a (m=1,2,3,...; m=0 gives the trivial null solution, which is why TM modes require m≥1); applying Ez=0 at y=b forces ky = nπ/b (n=1,2,3,...; likewise n≥1 required) — confirming that TM modes require both indices nonzero (no TMm0 or TM0n modes exist, unlike TE modes).
Transverse field components: with Ez known and Hz=0, the transverse components follow from the standard TM-mode field relations (derived generally from Maxwell's equations decomposed into transverse/longitudinal parts, the same decomposition referenced in Part B, Q.1 of the companion 2024 Main/Back paper):
Substituting the known Ez solution and differentiating gives the complete field pattern of any TMmn mode in closed form; the corresponding cutoff frequency is fc = (c/2)√[(m/a)²+(n/b)²] — the same formula as for TEmn, confirming the TE/TM degeneracy for m,n≥1 discussed in Part B, Q.6 of this same paper — and the lowest-order TM mode overall is TM11, since m=0 or n=0 is excluded for TM modes by the boundary conditions derived above.