Q1Electrical Materials
Question
Q.1. (a) Why skin effect is absent in DC fields? (b) Derive the relation between skin depth, permeability and conductivity of conductor. (c) What is the skin depth of a conductor with 10 mho/m at a frequency of 10 MHz?
Answer
(a) Skin effect requires a time-varying flux, so it vanishes for DC; (b) solving Maxwell's equations in a good conductor yields exponentially decaying current with skin depth δ = 1/√(πfμσ); (c) for σ=10 S/m at 10 MHz, δ ≈ 5.03 cm.
(a) Why skin effect is absent in DC fields: skin effect is caused by electromagnetic induction — the alternating magnetic flux linked with the current induces eddy EMFs inside the conductor that oppose current flow most strongly at the center, forcing current toward the surface. Induction requires a time-varying flux (Faraday's law, EMF ∝ dΦ/dt). For direct current the flux is constant, dΦ/dt = 0, no internal opposing EMFs are induced, and the current therefore distributes itself uniformly over the full cross-section: skin effect simply cannot arise in a steady DC field.
(b) Derivation of skin depth: inside a good conductor, Maxwell's equations with Ohm's law (J = σE, displacement current negligible compared to conduction current) combine to give the diffusion equation for the field/current density. For a sinusoidal field of angular frequency ω penetrating in the x-direction:
whose decaying solution is E(x) = E₀e^{-x/δ}e^{-jx/δ}, i.e., magnitude decaying exponentially with depth, with:
This is the required relation: skin depth is inversely proportional to the square root of frequency f, permeability μ, and conductivity σ. At depth δ the current density has fallen to 1/e (≈37%) of its surface value; almost all the current flows within a few skin depths of the surface. The relation explains the practical consequences of skin effect — higher frequency, higher permeability (e.g., iron), or higher conductivity all shrink δ, worsening the confinement of current to the surface, which motivates stranded/litz conductors, hollow tubular bus-bars and the use of thin laminations at power frequencies and above.
(c) Numerical evaluation: with σ = 10 S/m (mho/m), f = 10 MHz = 10⁷ Hz, μ = μ₀ = 4π×10⁻⁷ H/m:
The skin depth is approximately 5.03 cm. This relatively large value (compared to the ~21 μm skin depth of copper at the same frequency) reflects the very low conductivity of the given material — 10 S/m is closer to a lossy medium such as sea water than to a metal — directly illustrating the inverse-square-root dependence of δ on σ derived in part (b): reducing conductivity by a factor of ~5×10⁶ relative to copper increases skin depth by a factor of over 2000.
Practical implication of the frequency dependence: because δ ∝ 1/√f, the same conductor exhibits sharply different AC behavior across the frequency spectrum — at 50/60 Hz power frequency, copper's skin depth is around 9 mm, so ordinary solid conductors up to roughly 20 mm diameter still carry current fairly uniformly and skin effect is a secondary correction; at radio and microwave frequencies (MHz to GHz, as in this problem), δ shrinks to micrometres in good conductors, so essentially all current flows in an extremely thin surface layer, and RF conductor design (silver-plated waveguide walls, PCB trace surface finish, coaxial cable shields) is governed almost entirely by surface conductivity and roughness rather than by the bulk material deeper inside — a direct engineering consequence of the δ ∝ 1/√(fμσ) relation derived in this question.